Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Consulus weighs in on Unilever’s ‘boo-boo’

Nov 14, 2013 | News & Updates, Singapore

A Thai company owned by Unilever recently came under fire for promoting its skin-whitening products by offering cash prizes to students. In light of a social media backlash that criticised the brand for appearing to link education to fair skin, Unilever Thai Trading issued a public apology over any misunderstanding regarding the campaign.

Speaking to www.worldtrademarkreview.com, Nicole Brion, Senior Manager of Digital Strategy at Consulus, urged brands facing this type of backlash to apologise quickly if their actions had unintentional consequences. She said, “If you are receiving negative feedback for a campaign that has already been released, brand owners should not be defensive about it. Openly apologise if it was really something that was unintentional. If you give critics more ammunition after the fact, you will keep suffering the backlash, so you should act, lay low for a while and try to exercise more purposeful campaigns in the future.”

Brion also added that the public is often quick to forget these ‘boo-boos’, saying, “The damage is really not long lasting. The negative reaction tends to be extreme at the start but then people forget about it relatively quickly.  There is always the next thing to focus on, so if brands take a misstep in their campaigns, they can move forward by trying to not let it happen in the future.”

Read the full article here.

Read next

Consulus and LID announce a new strategic partnership in London

Consulus and LID announce a new strategic partnership in London

Singapore & London – Consulus, a Global Creative Change firm, and LID Business Media, a leading international business publisher, today announced a new strategic partnership in London. This collaboration will see LID take over the leadership for Consulus Press,...